Leaders Who Live on Different Planets (Jobs and Behar)
A few weeks ago I did some blogging about Steve Jobs and Apple and the tension I felt as I read about Jobs' leadership style. To say it bluntly, Jobs exemplifies most of what I think is wrong with leadership today. I won't list all those things again. Unfortunately (for me), by being the wrong kind of leader, Jobs gets extraordinary results and he has gained the world through the production of a truly superior computer product.
And soon after I finished that book, I read Howard Behar's book about Starbucks. And Behar represents just about everything that I think is right about leadership. And he also has a superior product and great success.
Two leaders. Two leadership ways that are polar opposites. Both eminently successful. One I respect and the other I "almost" despise (that is the leadership ways, not the people).
I guess this is my question. Is there a place for Jobs' style of leadership, even if it is all wrong?
And: Does the end (a superior product that makes tons of money) justify the means (the leadership way of Jobs)?
Here is one more question:
What good will it be for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul?(Matthew 16:26)
Brian Rice







